Beta

Flashcards Studio

Write, submit, and receive AI feedback with score breakdowns.

Study Settings View Stats

Grades Left 0 this week

AI Graded 0 this week

Tracked Cards 0 saved

Due Review 0 cards

Source Partnership Dissociation Partnership Dissociation Showing the closest available flashcard practice.

Topic

Question Type

Reader

0 tracked cards Contracts

A developer promised a city that it would pay a named landscape designer $40,000 for plans the city already owed the designer. The designer learned of the signed contract and bought specialized software in reliance on the promised payment. The next week, before payment was due, the city and developer amended their contract to delete the designer-payment clause.
Which statement best describes the effect of the amendment on the designer's rights?

Choose the Best Answer

The amendment is ineffective against the designer if the designer's rights vested through justified reliance before the amendment. The amendment is effective because named beneficiaries are treated the same as incidental beneficiaries until payment is due. The amendment is effective because beneficiary rights cannot vest before the beneficiary files suit. The amendment is effective against the designer because the contracting parties may always eliminate a beneficiary's rights before judgment.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello