Flashcards Studio

Lena was arrested and charged with felony embezzlement carrying a maximum sentence of three years. Her trial began 26 months later. The first four months were caused by Lena's request to replace counsel. The next 14 months resulted from repeated prosecution requests for continuances because the assigned prosecutor was busy with other cases. The final eight months resulted from a crowded court docket. Lena filed two written speedy-trial demands during the delay. By trial, a former bookkeeper who would have supported Lena's defense had died.
On the first day of trial, the judge closed the courtroom during testimony of the company's chief financial officer, saying only that "financial privacy is important." The judge made no findings and did not consider alternatives. Before evidence began, the judge also told Lena that a bench trial would be faster. Lena nodded but never signed a written waiver or personally stated that she understood the jury-trial right.
After conviction, Lena argues that her speedy-trial, public-trial, and jury-trial rights were violated. Analyze each claim and the likely remedy.